Contents
A source code audit can take less time than a new feature sprint or more than a month of engineering. It’s very difficult to estimate how expensive it can get without knowing all the factors that make up the cost of code audit services.
This guide explains what drives the pricing across audit types and services and the exact things you should track to estimate your budget. Then, we’ll give a few pieces of advice on how to find the most fitting auditor for your codebase.
Let’s start with the code audit service types.
What’s Included in Code Audit Services?
A software code audit is an in-depth assessment of your software’s performance, security, reliability, readability, and regulatory compliance. In other words, audits show if your product is fast, stable, safe, and easy to update.
Audits are different from everyday reviews that happen during development because they assess the full surface of the product. That takes time, so software code audit services are usually completed in a series of stages:
Architecture and boundaries:
Mapping the major parts of the software, including how modules (separate functional pieces) interact and depend on each other, and who owns each component. Auditors also evaluate whether the architecture can scale, maintain performance under load, and update without breaking.
Internal code structure:
Assessing the code for inefficient or risky patterns, such as duplicate logic, deprecated or overly long functions, confusing branching, dead code, and overly complex responsibilities.
User interface and user experience:
Examining the front-end (user-facing) parts of the app, design choices, compatibility with devices and browsers, and interface behavior that can slow users down or cause errors.
Testing and quality control:
Checking whether tests are relevant and fully cover critical features (like business logic, authentication, data processing, etc.) and if the CI/CD pipeline catches all problems before merging.
Data and error handling:
Examining how the system validates user input, enforces permissions, logs errors, and recovers from failures, so small issues do not corrupt data or break software functionality.
Code security:
Assessing code, libraries, and selected services for exploitable weaknesses, such as unsafe credentials handling, exposed secrets, injection risks, and missing safeguards around sensitive actions.
Build, deployment, and configuration:
Checking if your software build and release processes are reliable, repeatable, consistent across environments, and whether teams can roll back (revert) safely if a release causes problems.
Third-party integrations:
Scrutinizing how the external services and libraries interact with your codebase, including whether they introduce bottlenecks or vulnerabilities to your software.
Documentation:
Reviewing the setup documents, architecture summaries, maintenance guides, and inline comments in the source code to ensure they’re accurate, easy to understand, and up to date.
Why Invest in Code Audits?
Companies must conduct code audits to expose structural flaws in their code. That includes checking and fixing:
- Security vulnerabilities that can lead to breaches or compliance violations
- Recurring issues that throttle developers’ productivity
- Poor design decisions that accumulate in technical debt
- Failures that may cause system-wide outages
Audits help inform business decisions, too. For example, they help you calculate project budgets, plan modernization, validate a vendor’s work, or get an understanding of the company you’re trying to acquire.
Given the comprehensiveness of code audits, it’s important to understand what’s involved. That way, you can forecast the time and expenses required and allocate budget accordingly.
Software Audit Cost: Key factors
The cost of an audit largely depends on the length of time it takes, since auditors generally charge on an hourly rate. The following factors affect the total number of hours needed, and, subsequently, the costs.
Audit Type and Scope
The scope of work and boundaries define what your auditor should review. A simple security audit might scan for known vulnerabilities, leaked keys, and obvious risky patterns. But deeper assessments can combine multiple audit types and involve more manual testing, edge case checks, and provide evidence for the development team to act on.
Codebase Size and Complexity
Lines of code, components, services, endpoints, libraries, and integrations all affect the scope of work. Complexity increases due to dependencies, unclear boundaries, mixed responsibilities, and poorly documented functions. Plus, shared systems often multiply effort because a mistake in one code line can affect other services, which auditors must track and document.
Existing Technology Stack
Programming languages, frameworks, cloud services, and management tools make a difference. Older or proprietary platforms, especially if they’re poorly documented, will take longer to review. Additionally, auditors will need more time to set up their testing tools in heavily customized stacks for the results to be more reliable.
Compliance Requirements
Auditors must understand which security and privacy guidelines to apply, identify where those rules touch your configurations, and then verify that the controls work consistently. For instance, a code audit for a retail data platform may need extra checks around customer data access. And more privacy-focused industries, like healthcare, will require auditors to trace regulated data in its entirety, verify every permission gate, and check every logging point.
Location of the Audit Company
Rates for source code reviews can differ drastically across markets. That’s because pricing often depends on the team’s language proficiency, communication overhead, and their overlap with your working hours. You should also factor in that some regions have more professionals who are used to working with specific stacks or niche technologies.
Urgency and Turnaround
Tight deadlines limit the vendor’s ability to find appropriate specialists, plan the scope of work, and test the codebase. This can force audit firms to pull senior auditors from other projects or hire parallel reviewers, raising the total cost of code audit services.
Auditor’s Experience
Seniority incurs a higher hourly rate but delivers more value. For example, our audits are conducted by experienced security professionals who can find root causes faster, test more scenarios to catch hidden gaps, and write clear remediation tips in reports. This can reduce the total audit spend by cutting the rework that often follows a shallow review.
Example Cost Ranges by Audit Service Type
Code audits can involve various types of reviews based on the company’s specifications. For instance, DevCom offers three audit options that you can mix based on your needs and budget, as shown in the table below.
| Code audit options | What it includes | Time | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Static audit | Reviews source code, coding standards adherence, delivery artifacts, dependencies, CI/CD pipelines, workflows, architecture, live strategy, and documentation | Scoped to codebase size, complexity, and goals | $5,000-$8,000 |
| Dynamic audit | Tests system behavior under input, including performance under different usage scenarios and loads, as well as security controls | Depends on the system size, team, and static audit results | $8,000-$16,000 |
| Implementation | Applies refactoring based on the audit reports, eliminates the root cause of issues, and optimizes codebases according to set standards | Custom | Custom rate |
| Full audit package | Combines static and dynamic audits with the implementation stage | Custom | Custom rate |
The scope of an audit may have to shift depending on what’s uncovered in the process, which is why it’s important to know how to estimate the costs for yourself.
How to Estimate the Cost of Code Audit Services
There’s no surefire way to know how much an audit will cost, but the following practices can help you make a reasonable forecast based on the available information.
There’s one more way to keep your estimates realistic, and it involves working with reputable audit companies.
How To Choose the Right Code Audit Provider
An independent third party can assess your system more objectively than the team that originally wrote the code. The key is choosing an auditor who focuses on issues that meaningfully affect your product, not one who delivers a long list of low-impact observations.
Use the factors below to evaluate vendors, compare proposals, and choose the right fit for your needs.
- Pick a provider familiar with your tools, front-end and back-end frameworks, database standards, and cloud platform.
- Look at the auditor’s track record to see if they have worked on or optimized software similar to yours.
- Make sure the auditor’s team understands your industry-specific regulatory rules, security standards, and the risks they bring.
- Determine if the audit process fits you. This includes learning what they do and in what succession, what inputs they need, which tools they run, how they verify claims, and how they produce reports.
- Confirm that the company respects your confidentiality and intellectual property, and that they have sufficient security and access control mechanisms.
- Establish if the company provides post-audit support, remediation, and retests, or if it can optimize your source code based on the findings.
- Watch out for red flags, such as providers that cannot describe their audit process, share relevant examples of similar work, or provide concrete estimates.
- Compare proposals or rates from different auditors by scope, deliverables, exclusions, pricing models, and estimated rates.
DevCom can review your codebase and deliver a detailed audit report with clear, prioritized recommendations. If needed, our team can also help implement the improvements identified during the audit.
More importantly, we can give you a realistic cost estimate for software code audit services, combined with all the exclusions and potential risks. If you’re interested, contact us to learn about our process.
FAQ
Businesses invest in code audits to spot problems that raise risks, slow delivery, and reduce their value. A thorough audit finds critical security gaps, failure points that can cascade into outages, messy design choices that grow technical debt, and structural flaws that slow your development.
The costs depend on how long the codebase takes to analyze, test, and document. Software development companies offer different audit service packages, such as a static audit (assessment of code, documentation, CI/CD pipelines, etc.), a dynamic audit (hands-on testing of the system under different scenarios), and implementation (fixing and optimizing the codebase).
The main factors are audit goals and scope, the type of audit, and the complexity of your codebase. A focused assessment for one service can move quickly, while a deeper audit across several environments in a highly regulated industry can take considerably longer. Your company’s documentation, access approvals, staging environments, and technical stack will affect the time required, even for an experienced audit team.
Costs are driven by the scope and depth of work. Complex codebases with mixed responsibilities, hidden dependencies, or poor documentation take longer to review, raising the total costs. Other important factors include the technology stack, compliance requirements, urgency, and auditors’ experience.
