...
Secure Code Review Services

Secure Code Review Services

Catch security flaws before attackers use them, meet compliance requirements, and protect your reputation. Whether it’s live
or still in development, your code gets reviewed line by line—with a remediation roadmap to close every gap we find.

Home/ Services / Secure Code Review Services

Source Code Security Review Services We Provide

We offer two types of secure code review services, depending on the phase of your project:

Ongoing Code Review Services

Ongoing Secure Code Review

A security service team works alongside your application developers throughout the software development lifecycle, checking new code for exploitable errors as it's written. Each pull request goes through automated scanning and a manual pass from an AppSec engineer trained to spot business-logic flaws that production security tools alone won't flag.

Clients on this model typically get:

  • A named team that becomes familiar with the codebase and its risk areas over time.
  • Vulnerability scanning of each pull request.
  • A review cadence—daily, weekly, or per sprint—set around how often your team deploys.
On-demand Code Review Services

On-demand Secure Code Review

Beyond continuous coverage, we also offer a one-time assessment of your code. Depending on your needs, we can perform a quick automated scan using our multi-tool methodology, an analysis focused on a specific area, or a line-by-line manual review of the entire codebase.

Whatever the scope, the review covers two complementary techniques:

  • Static application security testing, examining the code itself for syntax-level bugs, architectural flaws, and insecure patterns without running the application.
  • Dynamic application security testing, running the application to surface issues that only show up during execution.

Security Flaws We Identify

Our reviewers check for the vulnerability classes most often seen in production breaches, aligned with the OWASP Top 10 and CWE frameworks.

  • icon Injection flaws. NoSQL, command, LDAP, and SQL injection points where unvalidated input reaches a query or system call.
  • icon Authentication flaws. Weak session management, missing multi-factor enforcement, and predictable credential recovery flows.
  • icon Broken access control. Endpoints or objects reachable by users who shouldn't have permission—a common source of data leaks.
  • icon Sensitive data exposure. Unencrypted data in transit or at rest, and secrets stored in plaintext or committed to version control.
  • icon Security misconfiguration. Default credentials, verbose error messages, and unnecessary services left open in the deployed environment.
  • icon Cross-site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery (CSRF). Unsanitized output and missing anti-forgery tokens that let attackers hijack a user's session.
  • icon Insecure deserialization. Object handling that lets an attacker execute arbitrary code by manipulating serialized data.
  • icon Server-side request forgery (SSRF). Application logic that can be tricked into making requests to internal systems.
  • icon Vulnerable and outdated components. Third-party libraries with known, unpatched CVEs.
  • icon Insufficient logging and monitoring. Gaps that let an intrusion go undetected long after it starts.

Our Secure Code Review Methodology
for Automated Reviews

Since no one tool catches every vulnerability class, multi-tool automated scanning lies at the heart of our code security review methodology.
It involves four steps:

Step 1:

We run several AI-powered automated scanners in parallel,
each producing its own independent set of findings.

Step 2:

The agents check each other’s findings, flagging
inconsistencies and filtering out false positives.

Step 3:

The cycle of cross-checks repeats until all agents agree
on the results.

Step 4:

A human expert verifies the automated scanning results.

What You Get from Our Secure Source Code Review

Our code security review helps you find gaps early and address them before they turn into data exposure, costly fixes, compliance issues,
and disrupted operations.

icon

Make releases
less risky

icon

Reduce the cost
of security fixes

icon

Protect
sensitive data

icon

Prepare for compliance and
security audits

icon

Catch security vulnerabilities
before attackers do

icon

Build security into
future development

Discussion background

Don't let online attack risk, non-compliance, or
data leakage stand in the way of your growth.

DevCom’s security experts review your code from A to Z.

When Do You Need Secure Code Review Services?

  • icon Before a production release. Catch exploitable flaws while they're still cheap to fix.
  • icon Before a compliance audit. Demonstrate that your code meets HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, or other applicable standards.
  • icon After a security incident. Identify how an attacker got in and confirm the cyber threat is eliminated.
  • icon Before a funding round or acquisition. Investors and acquirers increasingly request a secure code review as part of technical due diligence.
  • icon When onboarding a new client with strict security requirements. Enterprise and healthcare clients often require proof of a recent review.
  • icon After adding a major integration or third-party dependency. A new attack surface deserves a fresh look.
  • icon On a recurring schedule. Ongoing reviews integrated into your SDLC catch vulnerabilities as code ships, rather than in one large batch.

The Cost of Secure Code Review for SaaS Apps and Beyond

Pricing depends on the size of the codebase, the depth of review requested, and the technology stack involved. Key cost drivers include:

Codebase size and complexity.

The cost of a secure code review service for a SaaS app built on microservices is typically lower than auditing a monolithic enterprise platform with years of accumulated patches and historical data.

Review type.

A one-time on-demand assessment is priced differently from an ongoing review integrated into your software development lifecycle.

Scope.

A quick security snapshot of an MVP performed by automated tools with human validation will have a higher cost than a line-by-line manual review of a complex system.

Technology stack.

Legacy or uncommon frameworks can extend the time needed for manual analysis.

These are the approximate ranges per code review scope:

Review ScopeDescriptionBest FitEstimated Price Range
Security SnapshotAutomated scanning with human validation of priority findingsSmall apps, MVPs, internal tools$5,000 – $8,000
Critical-Path ReviewManual review of agreed high-risk workflows—authentication, APIs, paymentsProduction systems, core SaaS apps$8,000 – $13,000
Comprehensive
Security Review
Line-by-line manual review, threat modeling, and remediation guidanceComplex or high-impact systems, regulated industries (HIPAA)$13,000 – $20,000

We provide a fixed quote after a brief initial scoping review, so you know the cost before the full engagement begins.

Technologies We Review

Our engineers hold certifications across the stacks most businesses use in their software systems, including AWS, Azure, .NET, Java, SQL, and
Salesforce. We review technologies behind backend and frontend, mobile apps, databases, and infrastructure, among others.

Web development

ReactJS

React

JavaScript

JavaScript

Angular

Angular

AngularJS

Vue.js

AngularJS

Ember.js

HTML/CSS

HTML/CSS

jQuery

jQuery

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

ExtJS

ExtJS

Responsive Design

Responsive Design

PWA

PWA

Why Choose DevCom as a Code Security Review Service Provider?

Framework

A Framework Built from
Repeat Engagements

Our proprietary review framework has been sharpened across more than 50 long-term client projects, applied on a quarterly cycle to catch new security risks as codebases evolve.
Certifications

Certifications Across the
Stacks Businesses Run

Our engineers hold certifications in AWS, Azure, .NET, Java, SQL, and Salesforce, so the depth of a review doesn't depend on which technology your application happens to use.
Tooling Paired

Tooling Paired with
Human Judgment

SonarQube, ReSharper, Amazon Q, JetBrains AI, and GitHub Copilot handle the scanning; our engineers handle the interpretation—tracing the flaws that automated security solutions flag as clean.
Track Record

A Track Record in
High-Stakes Industries

We've reviewed code for healthcare platforms handling protected health information and fintech applications processing financial transactions, where a missed vulnerability carries regulatory and reputational weight.
1000+
Projects Delivered
26+
Years in Business
280+
Experts
200+
Clients Worldwide

Secure Code Review Case Studies

See Why Our Clients Trust Us

Steven Lutz
Operations Manager, ReNew Biomedical Services
"DevCom has successfully migrated the client's customer base and service records into the new system. The team delivers items before schedule and has also reduced or eliminated some internal client processes that are prone to mistakes. DevCom works on an agile basis, so continuous feedback is critical to enabling their team to set priorities appropriately and share concerns if needed.”
Rick Starr
CEO, The Five Agency
"Their intentionality and thorough understanding of my business impresses me. DevCom has built the data analysis tool and built out HubSpot integrations, eliminating manual follow-ups. They've also maintained the website, allowing the client to build an API to automate website updates. The team is excellent at projecting timelines and understanding business needs.”
Bin Zhu
VP of Software Development, General Devices
“Internal stakeholders are happy with the platform’s UI/UX, and the client was delighted with DevCom’s efficiency and professionalism. The team was responsive and flexible throughout the process and delivered on time and within budget. Their thorough discovery phase and expertise stood out. The team thought out of the box and always listened and responded to our feedback.”
Dion McCormick
Platform Engineer, GBS Enterprises
"The expertise DevCom provided throughout the transition to AWS generated a more cost-effective structure by mitigating investments in unnecessary services. By continuing to optimize the platform, the team continues to promote cost savings. They share feedback to support a valuable partnership. We really like working with DevCom because their team’s proactive and responsive."
Richard Clarke
Chief Sales & Marketing Officer, Del-Air Heating & Air Conditioner
“Because of them, we've lowered our administrative costs and increased our administrative quality. DevCom takes time to listen to project needs and collaborates with the in-house team to provide high-quality service. They're responsive and identify the best solutions, even if it’s not what is most lucrative for them. Their work has resulted in increased sales.”
Chris Harris
CEO, TradeWeb
“DevCom is a TradeWeb, Inc premier business partner in many complicated development tasks. We have been working together for over twenty years. Today, TradeWeb has over fifteen DevCom developers working on various projects and we could not be more pleased with the high quality of work they constantly deliver. We strongly recommend DevCom to any US firm who needs additional programming resources.”
Joao Paulo
Broadsoft Japan
"DevCom team is very professional. Their communication skills are very good, from finance team to developers, through the project manager. The PM is very competent in addressing issues. I like the way he was able to get to know the problem, analyse it and give rich suggestions and insights on how to approach the development. He is very polite, and calm. I highly recommend DevCom for your next project."
Val Gamerman
President, Pyramyd Air
“The client has been satisfied with DevCom’s services. The team utilizes Scrum methodology to execute tasks efficiently. Moreover, their dedication to the project and strong adherence to delivering quality work continues to stand out in the engagement. They have very dedicated employees, and the quality of their work is good.”
Stewart Skiff
President, Tracksystems
"Our company has had the pleasure of working with DevCom on the development of several software applications over the last 10 years, some quite large. We found that they are very responsive to our needs and compile a quality product on time. We would recommend them to anyone who needs software application development, from Database to web Clients."
Artur Leonowicz
CTO, EasyCount
“DevCom delivered a high-quality product within a strict deadline, with the launched app earning praises from early adopters. The team is consistently communicative and thorough, sending detailed reports that kept the project moving forward. Communication and attention to detail are definitely DevCom's strongest points. Compared to some of the companies that we have used in the past, I was very impressed with DevCom’s project management. They met deadlines while happily accommodating all of our additional requests.”
Reimar Kosack
Founder & CEO, WWSC
"DevCom is very proactive. Whenever we have an issue, we can reach out to different resources. There was never a case in which I felt like I needed to escalate an issue to a supervisor. We’ve liked working with DevCom. DevCom completed development of the MVP in three months. The team employs a thorough quality assurance system that eliminates downtime and defects. The relationship acts as more of a partnership than a contractual agreement, and the agency is proactive in shifting resources to meet project needs."
Finn Gilling
Founder & CEO, Gilling/The Human Decision
"DevCom is a very friendly team. They are not tough business people, but actually enjoy what they do. They really have a personal touch. They're not a big organization with many rules. Each product offers exceptional speed and accuracy. DevCom's developers are uniformly productive, personable, and technically capable. The team's meticulous, highly communicative approach allows them to deliver comprehensive solutions and eliminate the need for rigid management structures."
Piers Wilson
Shareholder, SureTrak
"They're big enough not to be dependent on our project, but they're also small enough to care about it. DevCom is the right size for a company of our size. The application received great user feedback and created a monopoly within the automobile insurance industry. Code reviews from the Harvard Business School validated complex algorithms and praised DevCom for their effective development. Their project management was another strong suit."
Lloyd Jackson
Founder, JacksonGas
"Our company was very satisfied with the DevCom developers. They were timely with their submissions, their work product was very good, and when we needed to work through changes and other issues that inevitably arise as a programming project progresses, they responded promptly and without complaint. They charged a fair price for their services and delivered a product that met our needs."
Yossi Goldlust
Founder & CEO, search-massive.com
"I appreciated the collaborative nature of the relationship. Even though DevCom was technically a contractor, and I was just another client for them, I felt a strong personal connection. They were enthusiastic about their work in a way that went beyond just being professional. DevCom’s work had a direct influence on the long-term success of the project. The website helped build customer loyalty and was eventually sold at a profit. The team earned praise for their collaborative approach to project management and the strong, personal connection they brought to the project."

Secure Code Review FAQs

A secure code review includes automated static code analysis and dynamic vulnerability scanning, a manual line-by-line review of authentication and access control logic, a check of third-party dependencies for known vulnerabilities and API usage, and a report ranking each finding by severity with specific remediation steps.

Cost depends on factors like codebase size, system complexity, review depth, and project phase, ranging from $5,000 to $20,000. We provide a fixed quote after a brief initial scoping review.

Timelines depend on project size and complexity. A small application can be reviewed in a few days, while a large, complex codebase can take up to three weeks. We confirm a clear timeline after the initial scoping call.

We perform both. Automated tools quickly catch known vulnerability patterns across a large codebase, while manual inspection by security engineers catches business-logic errors and context-dependent risks that scanners miss.

Yes, we provide code review services for SaaS platform providers. We review SaaS codebases for the same vulnerability classes as any other application, with added attention to multi-tenancy isolation, API security, and how customer data is segmented between accounts.

Build safe code to protect your business and customers.

Whether it’s for an ongoing or on-demand review, our cybersecurity experts are here to help.

    Privacy Overview
    DevCom Logo

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

    Strictly Necessary Cookies

    Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

    Marketing

    This website uses analytical tools, like Google Analytics and some other, to collect information such as the number of visitors to the site and the most popular pages, what are visitors' behavior and experience at the website.

    We are not interested in a collection of information about our visitors who act as a private person. We are interested in understating of who from visitors act as a non-private person, who present organizations or companies that are theoretically interested in our services or any possible kind of cooperation with our company. Also, we want to provide our visitors with the best possible experience during visiting our website. These are the only reasons for using analytical tools and services.

    So, keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website and ways of cooperation with our visitors who do not act as private persons.